Nigerian history without Nnamdi Azikiwe and Obafemi Awolowo is impossible.

Zik and Awo were clerks, teachers, journalists and politicians. The former dropped his colonial name Benjamin, the later put aside his Christian name Jeremiah. As politicians they were great rivals. Zik ended up as Nigeria’s First President after serving as the last Governor–General.

The Presidency eluded Awo. In 1979, the Supreme Court had to rely on creative political mathematics to knock out Awo who had served as the de facto number two man under Yakubu Gowon between 1967 and 1971.

The Macpherson Constitution took effect in 1951 and called for indirect elections to the regional assemblies via electoral colleges. Like he had for the Richards Constitution five years earlier, Zik opposed but chose to contest so he’d have the opportunity to change the constitution.

On November 23, 1951, about a month to the elections, the Daily Times quoted Zik as saying, “So far as I am concerned, my aim in trying to get a majority in the regional and central legislatures is to firmly entrench NCNCers in a strategic position where we would create a deadlock and paralyse the machinery of government and thus rip the Macpherson Constitution and usher in a democratic one.”

Awo did not agree with Zik’s plan, but crucially, if Zik’s colleagues had understood his intent to torpedo the government, things may have been different. Zik’s plan was simple.

If the NCNC had won in the West, it would have, by the dictates of the subsisting Macpherson Constitution of 1951 been in a position to produce the four central ministers due the Western Region as well as the representatives for the Western Region in the Central Legislature.

It would have used that majority to paralyse governance from the centre in much the same way as it ultimately did in the Eastern Region in 1953. There would have been no ministers or premiers in both southern regions as well as at the national level.

Indeed, the central government in Lagos and the regional governments in the east and west would have been torpedoed in 1952 and what became the Lyttleton Constitution of 1954 would have come in 1952.

This was the reason Zik did not bother offering ministerial appointments to his party members. For Zik, the constitutional arrangement would have been torpedoed before the need for any such appointments, speeding up the decolonisation process. Crucially, he failed to explain this to his allies.

After the elections were held, and many NCNC members became aware of Zik’s plans, they changed their minds, and aligned with Awo. However, even after the AG had taken the reins of power in Ibadan, the Western NCNC still insisted that Zik and Adeleke Adedoyin proceed to the central legislature in Lagos.

Another miscalculation by Zik was his belief that in the event of an AG victory in the election, Awo would cooperate with him to achieve his own objective and speedily secure independence for Nigeria.

Unlike the other NCNC members, Awo was intelligent enough to understand what Zik proposed and its workability. But helping Zik paralyse government would entail pulling down governments in the regions as well, which was not in his interest.

If Zik’s proposal of paralysing government had flown, it would have meant repeating the elections under a new constitution, possibly through the universal adult suffrage that the NCNC had been rooting for. Awo could not be sure that his party would, at that point, win a repeat election in the West.

The only real chance Awo had of winning the Western Region election in 1951 was through indirect elections, the format used in 1951, in which manipulation, such as using the Obas to populate the electoral colleges with pliable electors, were possible.

Put more bluntly, the difference between Awo and Zik was this – Awo was a seasoned political animal who understood that politics is first about self-interest. Zik had his head in the clouds. Unfortunately, Zik, after the defeat, rather than staying back in the West and becoming opposition, went back to the East, in order to get into power.

His retreat set the stage for the misconception among ndi Igbo that Awo had used the tribal card, and later events strengthened that view. The political relationship between the Igbo and the Yoruba has not recovered since.

First, we must dispense with the notion that politics is “for the greater good”. Politics is about self-interest pure and simple. One of the things we have done wrong in Nigeria is to pretend otherwise.

Recently I was privy to an unscientific survey in which more than 80% of Igbo and Yoruba respondents identified ‘the North’ as the problem with Nigeria. However, asked if they’d be willing to work together to ‘overcome the North,’ respondents demurred.

Since 1951, the Igbo have chosen to ally with ‘the North’ against the Yoruba, and the Yoruba, have chosen to ally with ‘the North’ against the Igbo. The question is why have both groups decided to distrust each other since that time?

Given that Nigeria is not quite working, does it not make sense for the Igbo and the Yoruba to ally with each other politically against ‘the North,’ just once and see if Nigeria will have a different political outcome?

Consider this — what is considered ‘the core North’ has a total of roughly 30 seats in the Senate. Any other votes they get to move their agenda has to be arrived at by making deals with one another. The Igbo have 16 guaranteed seats (15 from the South-East, 1 from Anioma in Delta), while the Yoruba have 20 guaranteed seats (18 from the South-West, 2 guaranteed from Kwara). Note that I did not include the Ndoni area of Rivers for the Igbo, nor did I include Kogi West for the Yoruba.

The bottom line is that if the Igbo and Yoruba come together, they’ll have a total of 36 seats minimum in the Senate, and be able to push their common interest. With the ability to make other deals, getting a total of 73 votes in order to push their agenda is entirely possible. But no, because of a brouhaha 67 years ago between two men long dead, both groups carry on in an atmosphere of mutual distrust, and end up sacrificing their own self-interest.

Anyway, both groups clearly enjoy playing second fiddle.

News Reporter

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Skip to toolbar